And I assume that you can provide a reference to a finding of fraud by a competent enforcement authority? Otherwise, your statement strikes me as potentially libelous.
DO - thanks for clearing that up! And if any of the "rogues" were company principals and did in fact commit fraud in connection with the SLJB stock, then "Sulja" (in the company sense) is also liable for such fraudulent acts which may have occurred, under the legal doctrine of vicarious liability.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
