Interesting read, isolution, especially this section:
>>
Colleague Paul Okunieff, M.D., head of Radiation Oncology at the Wilmot Cancer Center, is more blunt about the effects of low oxygen, known as hypoxia. "The tumor is meaner if it's hypoxic," Okunieff says. "Oxygen is by far the most powerful molecule for making cells vulnerable to radiation. Tumor cells that survive hypoxic conditions are often the cells that are most aggressive, most hardy, and most likely to go out and start new cancer colonies," he says. They're also the tumor cells most likely to have mutations that make them prone to spreading. …Besides less oxygen to form free radicals, cells under low-oxygen conditions don't divide as much, so they have more time to repair themselves before being vulnerable to radiation and other measures that target dividing cells. It's also harder to get drugs to areas without blood vessels, and without those blood vessels even the body's natural cancer-fighting immune cells can't reach the tumor to attack it.
<<
--
Combo therapy does not have to imply that an anti-angio/VTA drug is administered at exactly the same time as chemo/radiation and, for the reasons mentioned above, it may be advantageous to use “phased” scheduling (e.g. an anti-angio single agent one week and a chemo/radiation single agent the next week). However, nothing in the reference you cited appears to change the fundamental premise that an anti-angio/VTA drug by itself is unlikely to work well in most solid tumors.