News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Jim_WI

07/11/07 10:57 AM

#1746 RE: gilead23 #1745

I'm not sure this is a "nah, let's do something else"

I don't really have a big problem with the "shared" business model and discussed it with Steve a long time ago. Obviously owning the plants and the produced gas would be the best option, but it's like the light bulb just went on in the BOD's heads. "Dang.. these things are expensive!!?!!"

This move shouldn't be much of a surprise to anyone, especially the BOD. I just wish they would have taken a harder look at realisy about 300MM shares ago.

A partnership with the dairies, sharing the capitalization and the production would allow them to get a bunch of plants going in short order. Yes they would concede the production revenues, but twenty nickels is still as good as a dollar.

The technology is good but one plant every year and a half isn't going to cut it. I like the option when weighted against the massive dilution that would be required to build the next ten plants themselves. Service revenues and a piece of the production revenues moving forward sounds like a rational choice given their current financial situation. Once there's a little change in the pocket they can go back to building their own plants.

The market doesn't seem to know what to think with only 15K shares sold.
icon url

Teamlasvegas

08/02/07 10:21 PM

#1765 RE: gilead23 #1745

Thank You gilead23

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Posted by: gilead23
In reply to: None Date:7/11/2007 10:35:31 AM
Post #of 1764

Got the shareholder letter

Even though I am no longer a shareholder.

Sorry to report I see it as a big negative. Sounds like they are thinking about completely switching business models.

One would think that since they have now spent years with the current business plan and are supposed to see it come to fruition they would pursue it with zeal.

Instead it sounds like they may be going a completely different direction.

How do you pursue a business plan for that long only to say
"Nah lets do something else"

Its not as if the need for lots of capital is a sudden suprise.

IESV lacks focus and direction and personally I would want to see new leadership if I still owned it. In fact if we got solid management in there I might buy some.