Replies to post #275835 on Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[janniebgood]

I thought it was a great article, very factual. Any others out there feel the same?

So much for "unanimous criticism", wherever you got that. You must be referring to those who didn't like his use of the term "adjourned charges". LOL You people can continue to mince words all you want. The outcome of the OSC proceeding and the factual basis of Rennie's articles will not change no matter how often you play the semantics card.

What was off topic about my post, Grande? BTW, retract means to take back, to disavow. Correct means to make changes (in this case, in order to make a more accurate statement). Semantics.

[EarnestDD]

Mr. Rennie's article in the Windsor Star was actually very factual in my opinion.
If Sulja has/had such a problem with the Windsor Star's articles do you not think they would have sued them for libel and slander? LOL
You know ... a special Seek and Destroy against journalists? LOL

[Risicare]

"Rennie Pilgrim of the Windsor Enquirer"

Nope. Gary Rennie of the Windsor Star. Is that a crude dis or do you need to do some basic DD?

[Jim Bishop]

I'm sure Gary reads here now and then, but he's never posted. I doubt he really follows the board. That's just too boring.

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/profile.asp?user=86399