who knows what some people would do with it.
What are you suggesting, Frenchy? That "some people" would try to sabotage the location? The only reason people want the address is in order to verify the claim by the company that it is indeed leased by the public corporation, and the claim by the company that it is an "expansion" of the current operation, which they have alluded is part of the public corporation known as Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd. (SLJB) by publishing such claims in a public release from the public corporation. That is surely not objectionable, is it? Again, as in the past, the company has obviously chosen to selectively release this information to only certain shareholders, since you yourself admit to knowing the location but refuse to reveal it to anyone else. After all, what if I am a shareholder (you have no idea whether or not I am, nor does anyone else), but get my point? I think this may be an additional matter that needs to be looked at by the OSC, as well as the SEC. Are you familiar with the disclosure rules for public corporation? I am.
As far as I know, "some people" have not brought about detriment to any of the other known locations of the company, so why is this one being treated differently? Food for thought.
Again, what is the address of the Calgary location?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
