Interesting, you're saying the hearing is postponed, where did you get that info?
You think the OSC has enough evidence to charge people in a hearing, but they agreed to do it later? LOL
Posted by: EarnestDD
In reply to: frenchy who wrote msg# 275723
Date:7/8/2007 3:36:51 AM
Post #of 275729
Are you that naive?
The lawyers for the two sides are in contact frequently.
So they agreed, for expediency and possibly because they were in negotiations on a settlement agreement, to postpone the hearing to a later date.