InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

poorgradstudent

07/05/07 5:31 PM

#4452 RE: rancherho #4451

One follow up question then:

Does the good ship Dendreon leak just as badly as most unprofessional / unprofitable biotechs?

The reason i ask is that it would appear to me someone on the inside would have had to tip you off about the 483 form because I don't remember reading about it anywhere.
icon url

DewDiligence

07/05/07 5:31 PM

#4453 RE: rancherho #4451

Thank you for your reply and good luck with your endeavors. Regards, Dew
icon url

SaulK

07/05/07 8:54 PM

#4457 RE: rancherho #4451

With respect to 9902a I think all oldtimers also recall the coy game Gold played with respect to 9902a data--namely repeatedly assuring us the results were "similar" and once or twice "very similar" to 9901--before the exact numbers were made public. Last I checked a p value of .331 is not "very similar" to a p value of .01. Shares took a giant hit when the truth came out, if memory serves. Not much credibility with me.

But Ranch--what do you say to David Miller's insistence that the class action is going to be tossed based on precedent of much more blatantly egregious failures to reveal 483's being dismissed with prejudice? I am still considering whether to join the class.
icon url

bcblbrbm

07/06/07 11:46 AM

#4467 RE: rancherho #4451

Rancherho - Sam here
Bravo. sam