Replies to post #275034 on Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[Disinterested One]

Do you mean today's hearing? In that case, I agree; all SLJB PRs since then, all zero of them, are factual.

[EarnestDD]

How then do you explain the errors in the 4/13 Seek and Destroy PR?

[boogaloo]

Sally, here we go again. So then, you feel that "SLJB" has filed a lawsuit somewhere? Per the seek and destroy PR.

If yes, please let me know which court system it's filed in. That info is not "secret". Why it's so tough to swallow that point is beyond me.

As to the rest of the PRs since the OSC hearing, aside from seek and destroy, I also think they could be true.

[janniebgood]

I don't think so. You seem to have forgotten about the obviously false "seek and destroy" PR. That cannot be construed in any form or fashion as truth.

[DownWithPumpers]

Because of possible reprocussions, I believe that we can take every PR they have released since the OSC hearing as fact.

On November 10th, 2006 Petar admitted the RCMP (on behalf of the OSC) were after him and Sulja: #msg-14705050
Sulja closed on that day at 12.1 cents. Since then Sulja has issued many false and misleading PRs in an attempt to disprove your belief.