Replies to post #274766 on Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[boogaloo]

First of all, that's enough of you claiming to know the motivations of others. You don't. I can only speak for myself, but you lump everyone together. I have no hidden agenda. My only objective is fairness so that unofficial info doesn't cause others to lose $$ the way so many did in the past with this stock. Period.

Secondly, I don't feel that a company with a pending lawsuit and also pending OSC hearing is the right one to be guaranteeing a price rise as you said, "this is going north no matter what".

You HOPE it goes north. It very well may. But you do NOT know that. And telling others that you DO KNOW it is... is irresponsible. Period.

I hope profit is made here, or at least loss recoup. But you, nor anyone, is in position to guarantee a price rise. I believe Airys was issuing warnings that folks had better buy while the stock was at .023/share. Do you understand my point now? Do you?

[marketmann]

nothing has been proven. airys backed down when confronted with facts.
there is nothing to connect sljb/nv to anything worth value.

[DownWithPumpers]

Sorry I didn't make that more clearly in my last post. For me, ownership isn't an issue. The shareholders own everything. I'm pretty sure that was addressed months ago and Airy's answered that question quite specif ically. BTW I also spoke to management personally and received the same answer.
But many here that still bring it up, why? Answer: To try to spread uncertainty to anyone interesting in investing in the company......IMO and why? Protecting new investors? That’s old and very played out at this point. There is a lot more than meets the eye with the constant bashing tactics....

LOL. Okay. But it was not addressed with proof, that's why people keep bringing it up. It was addressed in private phone calls with crooks employed by Sulja who stole millions telling fanciful lies.