News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Disinterested One

07/02/07 1:52 PM

#274288 RE: Sally77 #274287

Sally, what about the 13 April 2007 "seek and destroy" PR? Do you think that was entirely truthful?
icon url

boogaloo

07/02/07 1:59 PM

#274290 RE: Sally77 #274287

Sally, Objective post, nice job. Now on to your question of me...

Which is it? True or false? I'd lean towards thinking the previous PRs were false, obviously. But do I bring them up? Yes. Why? Because some deny history here, and I feel that can damage others.

And, YOU said it's not diluted. But, that contradicts the PRs. So, they lied, right? Ok then. I can accept that much.

Also, if the current PRs are truthful (they may be, or not, i don't know)... what about the April Seek and Destroy PR? They said they had their first success? Why aren't there court records of such success? Or was that PR not truthful? Keep in mind when you answer... a "PV" lawsuit is NOT a "SLJB" lawsuit. Was that PR an "oops"? It sure did amuse the penny audience on various forums. As to the other recent PRs, maybe they are true... I don't know. Or maybe they're not. Don't know that either.

I don't selectively choose items to suit my view. If they ever deliver something that's verifiable and good, I'll be glad for everyone and won't mind at all to say so.