Replies to post #311 on Rubber Technology International (fka RTEK)

[razr]

Arrow 9) You make another self credit attempt...

"I don't own any shares of brandX but that didn't stop me in trying to show them they should carefully look at their filings... these boards are for discussion. Ownership of shares is NOT a pre-requisite, is it? Were you bashing or pumping when you posted on Brandx's board? I stopped pointing brandX folks over to RTEK when it became clear that the "over hang" was severe and that as an investment at the current time I could not in clear conscience recommend it to anyone! Is that bashing?"

Back when I was posting more often I had a tit-for-tat policy on spamming. If someone spammed our board I returned the favor on their board. But you already knew that. If you selectively forgot that too than maybe rouster, samis and some of the other longtermers can verify I'm telling the truth here. Or if you prefer look up my history files and you may still find some of my old spams on other boards. Heck I remember you complementing me on a couple.

razr

[KauaiPI]

razr~yes indeed I would...

I asked you to show me ONE of the posts in which you felt he was "bashing" as you stated? " you now respond with;

How bout the ONE I responded to in which GolfD implied that RTI is a one customer company and won't have the income through the RAC offseason to pay their employees. Yes I definitely call that bashing. I suppose you call that a fair and honest evaluation/opinion supported by text from the SEC filings. Not hardly!

the filings alone would tell you that they are concentrating on the RAC industry (note their business plan and the revenues they they had/have from secondary markets) and while you seem to be reading an implication in his post, I did not. You are being much too sensitive by my way of thinking. Very defensive these days.... I guess you have been adding to your position? Then again perhaps not.