Replies to post #308 on Rubber Technology International (fka RTEK)

[razr]

Arrow 6) You may not have realized it but you partly answered question (Arrow) 1) with this one.

"I will still try to re-post your posts from RB that I found questionable and do a "point-counterpoint" for you just in case you missed what I am trying to say... such as"

http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=RTEK&read=23850

Refer to my Arrow 1) reply for the rest of answer to this one.

razr

[KauaiPI]

razr~as with #306 and #307 this one also indicates what you are feeling but my friend you need to get past that IMO...

You pulled your shares off the table in "hopes" of buying back in at a lower s/p. That's a gamble in my books, anyone disagree? Oh, maybe you felt it was less of a risk because you feel that you can persuade others to sell but that's OK. It's still a "bet" and a "bash" to boot….

as I have been trying to state once the fundamentals changed (amended filing and SB-2 details) so did my opinion of RTEK. Knowing they were actively seeking to convert the debenture debt meant clearly to ME that the price was going to fall. A bet? hardly! To imply I was seeking to drive the price down is ludicrous or I would have sold ALL my shares (I didn't but now wish I had hahaha) and it seems to me that YOU wish you had as well?