Slacker, Re: BRCM v QCOM, and >>
“How many times has Q stated that if you use just one claim of one patent that you owe royalties?”
There’s a **huge** difference between licensing a patent portfolio internally developed over 20 years consisting of 1,000 of patents (many foundational) for ~ 4.5% and demanding a kings ransom (destroying the Q’s business model overwhelmingly supported by the industry) for one recently purchased patent (extraneous/ obscure/ questionable).
I would expect you to see the difference, and hopefully the courts in their review as well!!!