News Focus
News Focus
icon url

teapeebubbles

06/04/07 8:21 PM

#30155 RE: teapeebubbles #30154

Last week, I had an item detailing the bizarre interest in some media circles with the presidential candidates’ (and their spouses’) appearance. Apparently, the craziest example hadn’t come yet.

Consider this exchange on MSNBC this morning, between Joe Scarborough and CQ’s Craig Crawford.

SCARBOROUGH: Have you seen Fred Thompson’s wife?

CRAWFORD: Oh, yeah.

SCARBOROUGH: You think she thinks she works the pole?

CRAWFORD: That’s what a Hollywood career will do for you, I guess.

SCARBOROUGH: What do you mean?

CRAWFORD: You get wives like that.

I’m not even sure where to start with something like this. This level of misogyny is uncommon among major national media figures, especially on the air.

I can vaguely understand joking about Thompson marrying a much-younger woman. This seems like standard fare for those looking for a cheap laugh related to the presidential race. At the time of their marriage, Thompson was 60; his wife was 35. It’s entirely irrelevant, but if someone’s looking for something to tease him about, this is going to get some attention.

But even this joke is about the candidate, not his spouse, who has nothing to do with politics at all.

Ed Morrissey’s take mirrored my own.

Anyone who has watched Scarborough for any length of time knows that Scarborough can be an ass. What we didn’t know was that he could also be tacky enough to attack someone’s wife in the most personal of terms. Thompson’s wife is beautiful, but that doesn’t make her a whore or a stripper. Perhaps it speaks to Scarborough’s view of women that he immediately associates one with the other. […]

This is nothing more than character assassination, and especially egregious as it targets someone who isn’t even a political player. Scarborough should be ashamed of himself.

Indeed.
icon url

teapeebubbles

06/04/07 10:55 PM

#30166 RE: teapeebubbles #30154

A Monday afternoon press conference by Justice Department officials announcing the indictment on 16 public corruption counts against Louisiana Democratic Rep. William Jefferson was shadowed by politics. Justice Department officials worked to emphasize that they would press their prosecution fairly and without partisan interest.

"The Department of Justice will continue to enforce the public corruption laws that are designed to ensure the integrity of our government," said Alice Fisher, Assistant Attorney General in the Justice Department's Criminal Division, as she introduced other officials, heavily emphasizing the word 'continue' as she spoke.

She added, "The Department will continue to hold accountable those public officials who will use their office for public acts such as the bribery schemes outlined in this indictment."

When asked why now was the right moment to indict Jefferson, Chuck Rosenberg, US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia answered simply, "I really just think we reached a critical mass and we were ready to go."

Since March 16, Rosenberg has also been serving as Interim Chief of Staff to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales after his previous Chief of Staff D. Kyle Sampson stepped down in connection with the controversy surrounding the firing of 8 US Attorneys.

Earlier, he had forcefully responded to the idea that the prosecution was in any way politically motivated or tainted.

"I'm going to answer that question not as the political appointee that I am now, but as the career federal prosecutor that I was for so many years...frankly we don't give a damn about politics. I don't care if he's a Republican, I don't care if he's a Democrat, I don't care if he's a senator, I don't care if he's a member of the House, I don't care if he's a state official, and I don't care if he's a local official. We believe he broke the law. That's why we brought the charges," he said.

Ken Keiser, the assistant director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Criminal Division also noted that the 'grave breach of trust' represented by Jefferson's alleged actions required prosecution.

"There is no level of acceptable corruption," Keiser said forcefully. "If there are examples of why public corruption should be our top investigative priority, this is certainly one of those."

Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also released a statement noting that she was aware of the political implications of the case.

"The charges in the indictment against Congressman Jefferson are extremely serious. While Mr. Jefferson, just as any other citizen, must be considered innocent until proven guilty, if these charges are proven true, they constitute an egregious and unacceptable abuse of public trust and power," Rep. Pelosi (D-CA) said in a statement at her official website. "As we have demonstrated in implementing tough ethics reforms and passing tough lobbying reforms already this year, Democrats are committed to upholding a high ethical standard and eliminating corruption and unethical behavior from the Congress."

The New Orleans Times-Picayune also says that Jefferson could continue to serve in Congress in spite of the charges filed against him.

Rosenberg spent time during the press conference outlining the public corruption charges that were contained in the 95 page indictment against Jefferson, including conspiracy, solicitation of bribes, wire fraud, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, money laundering, obstruction of justice, and RICO violations. Jefferson could face up to 255 years in prison if convicted of all the charges and receiving the maximum penalty, and be forced to turn over slightly less than $400,000 in bribes he received as he allegedly worked to broker a business deal between a Kentucky-based telecommunciations firm and a Nigerian company.

The US Attorney also said that Jefferson had committed "serious crimes" that were "in violation of his oath of office, his duty to the US Congress...and his duty to the citizens of the United States."

Moving forward, Rosenberg said that Rep. Jefferson would be arraigned on Friday, June 8. Rosenberg refused to confirm or deny whether or not there had been any discussions of a plea bargain.

The group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington posted the full indictment to their blog