Replies to post #969 on Lowman's All-in-One! (LMAO!)

[PinkZombie]

And perhaps it is simply an ethics issue with this poster, which is significant if he/she is in a profession that does have to obide by rules of conduct. It should be looked into no matter, just to get to the bottom of it.

GLTA!

[energymanNJ]

"Your honor, may I approach the bench?"

lol

"Permission granted, Counsel please approach."

What we have here your Honor is a clear case of :

Once in Doubt:

SEC v. Park, 99 F. Supp. 2d 889 (N. D. Ill. 2000)

http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0044-0094(200101)110%3A4%3C725%3AOIDSVP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-C

also a tad this >>>

http://knowledgebase.pub.findlaw.com/scripts/getfile.pl?FILE=articles/stb/stb000002&TITLE=Subjec....









I've been framed I tell ya get my lawyer on the horn >
tell him his son is locked up again.....lol

http://www.jacobsbarbone.com/jsp2261049.jsp

[coolhand]

Are you looking for this?

http://www.atomicbobs.com/index.php?board=299

[lowman]

Someone might want to mention on the WRNW board that regardless of whatever validity the court claims may have, they take several years in the least, to resolve, which by then, and many acquisitions later, will have no bearing on the company's success.

Most investors of WRNW today will probably not even be around in 2-3+ years, aside from the few who are TRULY Longs.

Even I haven't committed my self to THAT much....yet. Like everyone else, I need to see closings, then new contracts.