johnny, I know you didn't mean to, but you have hit the nail on the head.
Read the quote you just pasted.
No, I mean read all the words, not just the few that caught your interest.
Do you see it in there?
Do you see the reason that no one values DNAG technology very much?
You pasted it yourself and I'm sure you trust your source (lol), can you not see the significance?
Well?
Alright......I'll help you out here. Read this part carefully and try to understand exactly what it means.......If you still don't get it, let me know and I will explain it to you in smaller words. This is why no one else is pursuing DNAG and it describes pretty much what everyone else is working on.
However, as Patterson et al.5 recognize, admixture mapping cannot replace genotype- or haplotype-based association analyses.
Concentrate on the word CANNOT, and then work your way through the rest of it. I repeat, if you can't get it tell me, I'll be happy to explain.
regards,
frog