InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

stuck_holder

05/31/07 10:47 PM

#3960 RE: DewDiligence #3959

Dew, do you have any comments with regard to a question i posed earlier?

thanks in advance.

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=20057119
icon url

ocyanblue

05/31/07 11:05 PM

#3963 RE: DewDiligence #3959

Strictly speaking, there is a difference between excluding patients who did not have the data for an analysis algorithm and simply excluding patients. But that isn't relevant. This data was provided blind by the DSMB. Do you know of a way to game that?
icon url

io_io

06/01/07 8:55 AM

#3975 RE: DewDiligence #3959

Dew, Dew ...................

<<<<<"Maybe DNDN omitted a few selected patients to frost ....... a similar scheme with the 9902a Cox-regression analysis.">>>>

That isnt Spin, that's a downright lie. There is always some missing data when you have 20 disease characteristics measured in multiple clinics. Look in any trial paper.

You always get nasty when DNDN's stock price rockets. But this lie is so simple that it is apparant "the Emperor has no Clothes".