News Focus
News Focus
icon url

stockasaurus rex

05/17/07 6:12 PM

#398 RE: Dog on a bone #396

that 504 was done with a company ( nexus asset holdings) that doesnt exist and it was an illegal 504 and you are very wrong about the rest, they were all done through briner and his comapanies and there is NO antidulitive clause. I'm looking at the agreement, which of course isnt valid anyway
icon url

stockasaurus rex

05/17/07 7:26 PM

#399 RE: Dog on a bone #396

guess what, doggiedog dog. oooooops
icon url

overachiever

05/17/07 8:18 PM

#400 RE: Dog on a bone #396

I guess you should be talking to the US Securities Regulators. You are one clueless lost puppy if you think those 504 are not Briner's problems. You also must keep in mind that the Briner Group included many of the perps who subsequently dealt with the WHA. Liem and the rest were partners of Briner's. You sure don't know much.

LMAO@ you for blaming Ricky for the way Briner structured those deals.


Do I need to direct you to Justice Dept prosecutions over these very same issues on the part of finance people for you to understand?