Bag8ger, I'm sure that Shriver has Frudakis full measure by now. The compensation amounts that have been announced over the last few filings are quite telling.
Don't try to make believe that Shriver has anything good to say about Frudakis, as that would only be your personal wishes.
Shriver has been a singular voice for the limitations of Ancestry and has often tried to manage the expectations of those who question him regarding its value.
Nevertheless, as you will recall from the filings from years ago, Shriver gets a cut of EVERY Ancestry or Witness kit sold. Nothing DNAG can do about that, even though the shares they have to give him every quarter have become worthless, he still is the only one making any money from his technology.
He doesn't hang around at all. They are obligated to pay him for as long as they license his stuff. His compensation will continue to appear in the filings for as long as that continues, although they have often referred to him, not by name but as a 'scientific adviser'.
regards,
frog