hollen....
Given that it is now Colvin's signature at the bottom of ENGY's filings I highly doubt we'll see Colvico 'extracted' from ENGY. I think you put it correctly when you said:
"if there was a practical means of doing so"
As per the 8K filing of July 18th it seems there was a proposal put forth to rescind the sale agreement of Colvico to ENGY. That was from Bowers' letter of resignation dated early June. In other words over 6 months ago. Frankly as far as I'm concerned its a dead issue. If you know of a proposal to extract Colvico please share it. If you have nothing to share beyond idle speculation with nothing to substantiate your opinions I'd ask that you leave it aside.
I don't appreciate fuzzy speculation saying a stock is going to the moon, and that big news is on the way unless there's something concrete to back it up...the same applies when posters are bearish. That is the heart of pumping and bashing imo.
Look at the most recent results...for the MRQ ended September 30th 2003, ENGY is delivering + income with its wholly owned subsiduary Colvico driving most of the revenue. That isn't speculation...that is fact verifiable from the MRQ's filing.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
