lines 4-5:
". . . .The Order provides that Defendant agrees to surrender the falsely issued shares of Bancorp stock..."
that sounds bad, eh?
however, lines 5-6 continue:
"The Order also provides that you are an innocent purchaser of the falsely issued stock . . ." and goes on to relieve liability and provide dismissal.
Sounds good, again, eh?
However? If I *had* been dealing in bad certs, I might seriously consider signing, based on that "innocence" clause...
Of course, there's a line preserving our rights to sue brokers, but what chaps my azz is the part about how this prevents "Defendants from incurring legal fees and court costs." lil over the top, there, for my taste...
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
