News Focus
News Focus
icon url

bob41

05/05/07 12:05 PM

#75842 RE: glaszman #75826

Look to your own advice, son. I believe I quoted your post.
icon url

nwsun

05/05/07 12:08 PM

#75843 RE: glaszman #75826

glasz-did you hear back from your senator or representative yet? if yes, what was their response?
icon url

Joda

05/05/07 10:08 PM

#76055 RE: glaszman #75826

Art / OBULL could one of you fine sirs relay this to TM please, believe the content of the post may be to his interest

""this was obviously a long-term con-game..."

Finally a bit of light.

Yes, the Plank and Sytner have been playing this game for a while. Three corporate hi-jackings? Not even the Plank is that dense.""

"a bit of advice for you bob, you claim that you are ready to drag out litigation? you might wanna run some of these accusations by your lawyers, and ask them if they think you are exposing yourself to liability.

the funny thing is that court statements are generally PRIVILEGED and these bulletin boards are not...
and neither are PR's which is pobably why this hasn't been PR'ed....

privilege basically means that if you sue somebody for defamation as a result of court activity? you won't get anywhere...
which is just common sense to most people, since it happens every time anybody makes any accusation in court, someone is right and someone is wrong... of course, common sense has been pretty scarce around here lately...

these bulletin boards have been pretty loosely regulated, but that is changing fast, new precedents are being set everyday, and accusing someone of criminal activity definitely falls under the category of "danger, will robinson".. Megas also seems to be the sort of person willing to try to set new precedents..."
icon url

idcc2006

05/06/07 3:58 AM

#76165 RE: glaszman #75826

But, what if the frivolous lawsuit causes real damage?