>>> Walker’s bias is the most pernicious kind <<<
This would be a good topic for a BV quiz. For example :
Consider the following two proponents of opposite sides of a hypothetical argument concerning drug development :
Proponent #1 , arguing the 'Pro' position -- His bias is based solely on his sincere beliefs and his concern for patient welfare , in fact , it is his raison d’etre. He has no financial conflicts of any kind.
Proponent #2 , arguing the 'Con' position -- His bias is based on the fact that the interests favoring the 'Con' position were the highest bidders for his services. He'd be happy to argue 'Pro' , if the price is right.
Question : Considering the welfare of society as a whole , rather than specific interest groups , which of the two proponents above would you consider more "pernicious".