News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Gcbr

12/13/03 11:08 PM

#10267 RE: mingwan0 #10262

OK what ever
icon url

trader guy

12/13/03 11:40 PM

#10268 RE: mingwan0 #10262

Ming, again, against my better judgment and desire to remain a seemingly disinterested lurking bystander, I must respond by saying that I am deeply flattered by your tracking and filing away for later use all the posts of a negative nature posted by me in recent history. Thank you for being so thoughtfull. I just hope you won't disappoint me by failing to file away and, in turn, reposting all of the positive posts I posted in my prior life as a nonthinking follower of the dream propagated by so many posting here and on RB.

Btw, can you prove that all of the possibilities related by me in the posts you reposted are not possible? If you cannot, then why repost them? If it was to simply remind me and all others of the very real negative possibilities in relation to our company then I say "good job, you did well".

I really do not intend any animosity toward you or any other poster here or on RB. I simply feel very strongly that all sides to an argument must be viewed as openly as possible in order to maintain an honest forum. You might call it FUD. I call it being honest with myself and others. Some may choose to disregard what is said and act in a manner contrary to what is said, but that is their perogative. After all, this is still a free country.

Iom
icon url

Straw5

12/15/03 1:29 PM

#10353 RE: mingwan0 #10262

ming--a couple of those reposted quotes are meaningless because they have been removed from the context of the original thread(s). The remaining are legitimate questions regarding material events that I'll bet you, w2p and others also asked yourselves at the time these events became public. Any reasonable thinking person would.

The only pattern shown is of someone asking questions on a stock message board to stimulate an exchange of opinions--pro and con--about significant factual events happening at DNAP. (What a novel concept!)