News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Ermilo

04/20/07 1:48 AM

#477 RE: shaw #476


icon url

Snifflet

04/20/07 10:09 AM

#479 RE: shaw #476

Thanks shaw, for sharing your research and your balanced views. You're a asset on this board. Your analysis is at a level I frequently see on Motley Fool boards. You're not a "Fool" are you?
icon url

ionna

04/20/07 11:01 AM

#480 RE: shaw #476

"there were no other technologies"

Not true.
As I posted early on that board, here is a patent from Exxon: " Long life lubricating oil composition with very low phosphorus content".
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20050026792.html

Here is one more from NewMarket Corp. (NEU): " Low sulfur, low ash, and low phosphorus lubricant additive package ..."
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20050026791.html

I am repeating my question: who do you think will win if there is a "war", XOM or PLRO??