Titan...
I am questioning his motivations. When he arrived on the scene FGFC was trading .01-.015 area. He claims to represent shareholders who own 2% of the float. Why would he start slamming this company with the restaurant fiasco (whether true or not)thereby dropping the stock price to its present levels. This being the case, wouldn't it be prudent to get your ass ets out of this stock and minimize your losses? Rather he held on and persued a lawsuit (pissing in the wind as far as I'm concerned) against the company. That step, from bringing allegations to suing the company is what baffles me. If I were one of his "associates" I would be wondering why he cut his nose off to spite my face. There is more here than meets the eye..a wise man once said "follow the money".
Also, yes I agree that the company is at fault to a degree. They should have been more forthcoming in all aspects of the allegations. Which by insinuation makes me believe the allegations have merit. Still there is no firm proof that any of these allegations are true beyond reasonable doubt. FGFC's silence only increases my suspicions. Maybe there silence is their way of staving off more actions by our resident psuedo-lawyer. The pending litigation only serves one purpose and that is to depress the share value....What is the motive? There are many possible answers.
If I owned as many shares as he claims to represent, wouldn't it be wise to let the chips fall where they may. At least you have some upside potential. Rather than to continue to depress the share value with very little upside potential. It makes no sense.
I am also of the firm conviction that Major posts on this board with another alias. For what reason I have no clue.
ENUFF Already
PAWN
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
