Well, this is my last post today then. I believe it was unwarranted because I know Dick would have PR'd whatever had been "uncovered" or whatever they were suspected of as soon as he knew. He knows better than to cover up such things. Dick happens to be honest. If you don't yet know this, then you really ought to continue your DD until you conclude either way. Honesty in management is the #1 most important trait of any company, IMO. Because the SEC has communicated so little with him (as evidenced by Dick’s lack of an explanation), and because of the timing of the SEC trading halt (right after the stock began to run, not a coincidence), and because I am familiar with government agencies and how slap-job work gets done when the boss' boss is unhappy or wants an update on something, and because DCBI is a one-legged pink (like all the others halted, not a coincidence) and has actually been spammed by third parties (although I am confident DCBI had nothing to do with it), and because they were putting out numerous PR's at the time of suspension (undoubtedly raised eyebrows, but like Dick said he is willing to prove every one of them), for these reasons I believe DCBI was wrongly chosen for a trading halt that was CLEARLY far more of a public relations stunt than anything else (after all, who are a few small-caps to bring grievances against the comparable juggernaut that is the SEC? The SEC has the luxury of being careless). The "possible continued investigation" verbiage is a backstop to prevent lawsuits from being filed against the SEC - they could technically still be investigating until hell freezes over. As long as they are "maybe still investigating" then a company can't take them to court over something that is both a secret, undisclosed, and “not yet finished.” Most of the negativity on this board is coming from people who didn’t get in (or in as much as they wish) before the PPS surge and are hoping for a drop.
Some of the above thoughts are somewhat fragmented because the full explanations have been stated in previous posts. You are, in a sense, asking me why I believe in DCBI over an obscure and secretive government agency that, historically speaking, does its job horribly. In order to understand that, its going to take a lot more than just one post, and I don’t have the time right now to write up a full report as to why I believe in the company. I won’t be selling until we hit the land of the dollars, so short positions and tiny setbacks mean little to me in the face of news like coming AF’s (something not to be taken lightly at all).
Have a good day.
PS - It is possible that the Form 15c2-11 was all that they were really halted for. If this is the case, then it was an outrage to have DCBI mixed up in a list of companies who were halted for would-be criminal actions. Filing a form and misleading the public are apples and oranges - but don't expect to hear that from the SEC, or from Dick, if he's smart about picking his enemies (the SEC isn't one you want).
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
