News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ernstge

11/18/03 6:11 PM

#18060 RE: janice shell #18052

Janice,

But what is her agenda? She shows up out of nowhere and starts accusing everyone but the people who stole her money. I just don't get it.

G.
icon url

Phil(Hot Rod Chevy)

11/19/03 2:56 PM

#18154 RE: janice shell #18052

Janice,

Why do you waste your time attempting to communicate with someone so glaringly stupid?

Have fun,
Phil
icon url

lindabruzzone

11/19/03 3:55 PM

#18170 RE: janice shell #18052

Janice,

You stated that you have performed MANY investigations and consider yourself to be a detective. You claim you are a "scambuster." What actually do you do besides sit on a computer and pull public records all day and then post what you find on a bulletin board? There are hobbyists all over America who pull public records everyday.

Besides writing 100,000 posts on an internet bulletin board, what detective work have you EVER done that is credible?

What I see occurring is bashing a stock, watching it go down, making some money on it and then discussing the company's financial problems publicly?

Further, I see that to be similar to the parent in a family law case, manipulating the law in order to gain custody or more support by false allegations against another parent. What I see is not "honest detective work" but profiting off others.

Have you ever worked in the field, held interviews, examined forensic evidence or testified in court, other than as a defendant?

Have you ever had a REAL client? I mean, anyone can "talk the talk" but have you ever "walked the walk." Have you ever had enough credibility whereupon individuals would hire you to do an investigation?

Do you have an investigative background. Do you have any experience with law enforcement besides being involved and questioned in any scams?

What qualifies you as an investigator?

If the 100,000 posts are anything like I have seen (bashing, harassment and intimidation,) that sure is NOT detective work.

That is what I am asking. I'm asking you to put your creds out there...your CVs...ah, you know what I mean.

Best to you,

Linda

icon url

lindabruzzone

11/20/03 8:55 PM

#18409 RE: janice shell #18052

Janice, you claim you have done dozens of investigations...the only one I know of is preparing documents for someone mentioned in a Chicago lawsuit (online, Chicago paper) and receiving $5,000 for organizing posts for that particular lawsuit.

I hardly consider 100,000 postings on the internet performing investigations. Besides that one individual, have you ever had other clients? Has anyone paid you to testify with expert testimony in court? Just how are you an expert as an investigator? Do you have law enforcement experience as an investigator? Are you licensed as an investigator? Do you work for someone who is licensed?

What company? And, have you disclosed in any of the 100,000 posts regarding companies, for whom you have worked?

I've answered the questions you and others demanded and please note, I have given you the courtesy that wasn't given to me, to allow you to answer before making allegations of 17b violations.

Just how many clients do you currently have? And on how many boards have you posted for those clients for whom you have performed dozens of investigations?

Thank you,
Linda Bruzzone


"How many investigations have you REALLY done?

Dozens. And nearly all of the companies in question ended up in trouble with the SEC, or worse. NONE has ever proved to be a good investment.

As well, I don't believe you have done any "scambusting" whatsoever and are even involved in that.

Then I suggest you read the articles that have been written about me, and dip into the more than 100,000 posts I've written over the last six years. I'm gettting the feeling that you don't "believe" anything that doesn't suit your agenda."