Replies to post #50732 on Eco Innovation Group Inc (ECOX)

[BigBadWolf]

100% False Laughable🤣 especially since l already sent you the links to verify said!

Certification is no problem, that mainly applies to the equipment the fuel runs through

In the aviation industry, the fuel itself is the most heavily regulated variable. Commercial airlines do not certify their engines to run any fuel that comes out of a certified pipe. instead, the fuel itself must be certified to meet incredibly strict chemical and physical specifications. As already relayed in my postings the $Standard is $ASTM D7566: This is literally titled the Standard Specification for Aviation Turbine Fuel Containing Synthesized Hydrocarbons. It regulates the physical chemistry of the fuel molecules (density, flash point, freeze point, viscosity, aromatic content, and energy density). Simple due dilly would relay that the turbine is unforgiving & if a synthetic fuel does not perfectly match the chemical fingerprint of traditional fossil-based Jet-A, it can cause engine seal shrinkage, fuel line gumming, or high-altitude flameouts. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and commercial airlines will never allow an uncertified fuel into an aircraft, regardless of how certified the reactor was that made it.

They've already tested the fuel on a smaller scale, now they ready for a larger scale of equipment, and it's the equipment the certification applies to no problem getting it approved.

Any of the investing public that actually believes the above 🙄 shows a complete misunderstanding of the ASTM D4054 process. The ASTM D4054 testing process requires massive, escalating volumes of fuel & progresses w/ each tier.
Tier 1 & 2 (Basic Chemistry & Physical Properties): Requires 10 to 50 gallons of fuel.
Tier 3 (Component & Combustor Testing): Requires 250 to 500 gallons of fuel to test in rig combustors.
Tier 4 (Engine & APU Testing): Requires 1,000 to 10,000+ gallons of fuel to run in actual, full-scale turbine engines on test stands.
Because ECOX does not have an operating commercial-scale facility, they do not possess the physical capability to produce the thousands of gallons of fuel required to even complete Tier 3 and Tier 4 ASTM testing. They cannot easily get it approved because they literally do not have the fuel volumes required to conduct the mandatory regulatory tests.

It's the equipment the certification applies to.

🤔Perhaps one is confusing ASME/OSHA Safety with EPA/ASTM Fuel Approvals. Correct that yes, a Gas-to-Liquids (GTL) reactor must have certifications. It needs pressure vessel stamps (ASME), electrical safety certifications (UL/CSA), and local environmental air permits. But these certifications only prove that the machine won't explode or leak toxic gas on the factory floor. They do absolutely nothing to certify that the liquid dripping out of the pipe is legally salable fuel. Even if the reactor is certified safe by local fire marshals, the EPA (under Clean Air Act Title 40 CFR Part 79) requires the manufacturer of the fuel to register the chemical product. Without this EPA fuel registration, it is a federal crime to sell that liquid as a motor or aviation fuel in the United States. Again🤣 since I've already sent you all the links any would need to verify the aforementioned & hell(o) any could easily find it for themselves if they bothered to look.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=177641350

[StarryComet61]

if they're already certified and it already works... and all they need to do is scale up... then whats the hold up with the name change !!