For a guy who has spent the better part of a decade obsessively bashing commons, you sure love pretending you’re the only person in the room who can read a balance sheet.
“Common shareholders don’t understand restructuring” is your entire personality at this point. The funniest part? You frame disagreement as ignorance because your ego can’t process that people may understand the risks perfectly well and still reject your thesis.
This patronizing “she was trying to save you” nonsense is laughable. You weren’t in the conversation, you don’t know what was said, and yet here you are once again appointing yourself professor, referee, and savior of capital structure analysis.
You say I “purposely misunderstand” things. No, I just don’t outsource my thinking to decade-old talking points delivered by self-important know-it-alls who’ve made a career out of talking down to common holders.
And the “I feel bad for you” line? Please.
You’ve been running the same superiority script for years. At some point it stops looking like expertise and starts looking like insecurity wrapped in condescension.
If your argument is actually that strong, make it on the merits.
Drop the smug drug therapist act.
Bullish