The Kepler scheme mirrors classic OTC microcap fraud patterns.... When you strip away the aerospace gloss, the Kepler–VC10 mess follows the same playbook you see in OTC microcap fraud.
Here’s the breakdown:
Borrowed Credibility
Kepler didn’t originate the tanker program. AeroVision did... the contacts, the engineering, the import pathway, the military use-case. Kepler’s “innovation” was simply taking someone else’s work and pretending it was theirs. Classic OTC move: borrow legitimacy, then cut out the source.
Multiple shells, rapid transfers, straw purchasers all designed to create transactional fog and break the chain of accountability. This is textbook microcap structuring.
The “Big Government Contract Coming Soon” Narrative... Scammers love to dangle bait like
DHS contracts NASA partnerships DoD interest NATO “engagement”
Kepler did the same thing:
U.S. Navy, USTRANSCOM, NATO — all supposedly lining up for a VC-10 tanker program that AeroVision actually built.
This is the oldest hype tactic in the OTC world.
Partner-Strip Maneuver.
Another OTC classic: Partner with a real operator...extract their IP... cut them out... claim ownership.
Kepler took:
The tanker program concept The engineering plan The import permits The military contacts The valuation uplift
…and left AeroVision with nothing.
This is the partner-strip in its purest form and Full-On theft by way of Fraud.
Kepler allegedly used GJD and multiple internal shells to move the VC-10 aircraft around until the trail blurred. This is exactly how microcap insiders hide asset theft.
Instead, Kepler allegedly took the work, took the contacts, took the aircraft, and walked.
Inflated Valuation Narrative
Scammers like Kepler love inflated asset values. Kepler’s alleged “$44M valuation” and “hundreds of millions in potential contracts” fits the pattern perfectly.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
