You call criticism “bias” instead of addressing the actual contradiction being pointed out.
The issue was simple: old October 2025 imagery was inserted into a present-tense May 2026 narrative: “truck just loaded” “3rd pile being tested” “another one by end of June”
Instead of addressing that directly, we got:
- timeline rewrites - parking lot theories - probe sensor theories - now philosophical lectures about “validation”
And somehow I’m supposed to “validate” posts built on: “I suspect” “I am guessing”
No. The burden is on the person making the implication, not on everyone else to suspend critical thinking around it.