If the Texatron were a breakthrough system that was commercially viable, it wouldn't be marketed via a 11-page PDF to retail investors; (common effen sense) it would be under a $500M+ Series A funding round from top-tier venture capital firms or the Department of Energy.. D–He 3 fusion requires approximately 200 million °C (360 million °F). There is no compact system on earth currently maintaining those temperatures in a commercially viable way. 🤔Pulsed, Magnetically Confined Plasma🙄 sounds high-tech, but it is standard fusion terminology. The breakthrough isn't the method it’s the containment. W/o the massive superconducting magnets I have referenced prior ($required no damn way around said fcol) (btw which AMFN definitely hasn't purchased), the Textron remains a theoretical model, not a working reactor.
[Now as an MBA I will tell you the word commercially viable means it can produce energy at a cost lower than or equal to current market rates. To be viable, you need Net Energy Gain (Q>1). No fusion reactor on earth including the $25 Billion ITER project has achieved sustained, commercially viable Q>1. For a company with a few hundred thousand dollars in prepaid warrants to claim they have a compact version of this is a massive leap to be kind aka more company 🤥s
Market Data 
Markets 
