News Focus
News Focus
icon url

BigBadWolf

05/03/26 8:55 AM

#53900 RE: getmoreshares #53899

2022 now 2026 now what’s happened since 🤔
Feature ST40 (Tokamak Energy) / Texatron (AMFN)
Verification Verified by Princeton Plasma Physics Lab (PPPL) / Self-reported via PR and Patent filings
Physical Asse A 50-ton, high-field spherical tokamak in the UK / Described as modular/plug-and-play units
Temperature 100 Million °C achieved and measured / $Theoretical targets with no recorded output
Partnerships US Dept of Energy & UK Atomic Energy Authority / No major government/academic research partners
icon url

tdbowieknife

05/03/26 10:56 AM

#53906 RE: getmoreshares #53899

Nobody here has said fusion was imposable. I have said that the Texatron will not work as a Fusion reactor. There are severe unresolved engineering issues and the physics they think they are working with is flawed.

The Texatron, as currently described, is not a viable fusion reactor concept. It relies on optimistic and unsupported assumptions about D–He³ confinement, pulsed shock heating, and direct power conversion, and it completely sidesteps the core engineering problems of repetition rate, component lifetime, and heat removal. Until they publish a full, quantitative power balance and durability model, this is a fantasy plasma experiment and not a path to commercial fusion... Or, in simple terms... PR bait.

.


.

Watch your wallet


Buyer Beware
Social Media Promoted Frontload Pump and Dump Share Selling Scam



..


.