Good lord... again...
You purposely inject your own words and narrative into my posts.
You admit to promoting stocks that were garbage "back in the golden era of the OTC." That's all that anyone needs to know, really, and it doesn't take a "penny stock savant" to apply copious quantities of salt grains to your posts.
Now, would you like me to go dig up my postings on Dr. Barry Ginsburg dumping the stock of this company back when it was Connectyx? How about the criminal history of Paul Michaels? Or I could just point out the assets of this company are licenses of drugs that were "orphaned," meaning the person/company that developed the concept had concluded there was no profit in completing their development through commercialization. They obtained those licenses on the cheap so they'd have something to pump and have essentially done nothing with them since they have no money.
Or I could point out (again) they had an approved offering and uplist 3 1/2 years ago that they abandoned without a single whisper as to why. Pretty sure that nobody wanted to buy the stock in the offering because the only commitments they were making on the "use of proceeds" was to pay off a loan and then pay themselves. A "legit company" would have told their shareholders what happened, now, wouldn't they?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
