Replies to post #160633 on TAP Real Estate Technologies Inc (RWAX)

[Shawonsarker84]

You are not wrong here

This is a typical merger play in OTC. Here is my 2 cents

1) It was hype in 2021 with stimulus checks and other factors in covid19. HMBL went for 6B full liquid market cap and did one reverse split. Many took an advantage of that unrealistic valuation including CEO, CFO, and their family, insiders. Everyone knew that HMBL pay can't compete against the gaints Google, Apple and Samsung pay. See what happened to PayPal now. They have lost a significant market cap since covid19.

2) Consolidation period for HMBL between 2022 to 2025 where 56B shares got diluted. This was the survival period for HMBL do or die.
3) New CEO, New business model, a brand new technology tokenization approved by SEC, approved patent, locked float. Please let me know who loaded that 37B shares in 2025. Then how did we reach .0005 last week despite having 800M unrestricted shares flooded in the market. TAP real-estate is already ahead of the game when it comes to tokenization with well reviewed platforms and users will keep growing. This is a 630T real estate digital market opportunities. There will be a lot competitors in the field but experience and mistakes take us ahead of the game. Imo










"Name one thing with Foote did with HMBL that was successful.

Answer - nothing.

The only thing he does seem to be good at is creating a story to hype…until it falls apart.

But he’s got a little headwind this time.

The OTC hasn’t lost it mind, he now has a reputation (not a good one) that precedes him and a 56 Billion OS.

Their not even pumping a product of RWAX…but of the private company TAP Inc… "

🤣😂

[ListenToTheTrees]

Another lazy take built on selective memory and zero understanding of how long-cycle fintech and markets actually develop.

You’re also pretending like reputation only moves one way. It doesn’t. In markets like this, sentiment flips fast when execution shows up and we’re already seeing that shift with actual filings, actual milestones, and actual assets being tied to blockchain rails. That’s more than 99% of tickers at this level ever achieve.

The 56B OS argument? That’s the favorite crutch of people who don’t understand restructuring. When you’re unwinding toxic financing and legacy baggage, share structure is part of the process, not the final state. Acting like it’s static just shows you don’t understand how these turnarounds work.

And the TAP Inc point? That’s not a weakness, that’s the model. Private + public alignment around tokenized RWAs is exactly how this space is evolving. You don’t build that overnight, and you definitely don’t do it inside a vacuum.

But here’s the part you’re really not going to like:

You are going to be here talking about Foote for the next decade.

Because every cycle has the same crowd:
The ones who mock early
The ones who misunderstand structure
The ones who disappear when execution compounds

So keep posting. Archive it. Double down on it.

Because if this plays out the way it’s being built, your comments won’t just age poorly, they’ll be receipts.