You corrected yourself on DOJ involvement. Good.
But that still doesn’t fix the actual issue in this case.
The docket, which is the official court record, shows:
– U.S. Attorney NOT served
– Attorney General NOT served
– No return receipt
– No due diligence declaration
So regardless of DOJ theories, whistleblower ideas, or “getting the feds involved,” none of that happened here.
There’s no DOJ involvement on this case.
There’s just incomplete service and missing proof, documented in AABB’s own filing.
You moved off the DOJ argument, but the facts didn’t move.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
