Replies to post #118453 on Asia Broadband Inc (AABB)

[JonDoe1]

Reading comprehension isn't your friend.

[NotTheRealBeeny]

You’re still arguing what you think should apply instead of what the case record shows.

The docket is the official court record of filings and actions.
It states:

– U.S. Attorney NOT served
– Attorney General NOT served
– No return receipt
– No due diligence declaration

That’s from AABB’s own proof of service filing.

So either:

1. Those service requirements were triggered and AABB failed to complete them, or

2. They included them unnecessarily and still failed to execute/document service properly

Pick your lane. Both are bad.

And this has nothing to do with your generic Rule 4 lecture.

This is about what actually happened in this case:
– Incomplete service
– Missing proof
– Judge rejecting their timeline

You’re arguing theory.
I’m pointing to the actual court record.
🐒 💩 🤡

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/62326738/Asia_Broadband,_Inc_v_Virtu_Financial,_Inc_et_al

[NotTheRealBeeny]

Why would the court mention it if there was no need to?

Just think, seriously.

You have a bias problem. There's no way you're this dense.