Replies to post #49869 on Renewal Fuels Inc (RNWF)

[trader59]

This isn’t a “major breakthrough,” it’s a.scam built on a lie. If they had a working 5MW prototype, the world would know, in fact the research and development leading up to it would have been meticulously documented in real scientific journals and they’d have a herd of research scientists, government regulators, and venture capitalists in their hip pocket the whole way. Further, if they had that prototype, they wouldn’t have chosen to inhabit a scam stock for essentially nothing and hand over their ownership to the shareholders of the scam stock, somebody or some company with very deep pockets would have bought them years and years ago. They don’t have a prototype, they don’t have viable fusion technology, they’re lying, telling an absurd fairy tale here on the OTC just like all the other pump and dumps you see here every day.

[ElonMusk1]

I understand the skepticism. The OTC market has seen plenty of pump-and-dump situations, so caution is reasonable. At the same time, labeling something a scam before verifiable testing or independent review can also shut down legitimate discussion.The real issue isn’t belief or disbelief, it’s evidence. If a company claims a working 5MW prototype, the claim should eventually be backed by measurable output, independent verification, and technical documentation that others can examine.Until then, it’s fair for people to remain skeptical, but it’s also fair to ask for clear benchmarks: verified net energy production, third-party testing, and transparent data. Those are the kinds of standards that would separate real innovation from hype.