Last year, shareholders had a legal right to demand management respond to the lawsuit in AZ. If they failed in their duty and a judgement was the result (happened), we could have filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit for damages.
This year, shareholders have a ENTIRELY NEW reason to file a shareholder derivative lawsuit: the acceleration of half-a-billion shares to a drunk ex felon named “Dorliss”
“Management and controlling owners can be sued if the unilateral changing of the share issuance date to make restricted shares unrestricted constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, or waste of corporate assets.”
IMO the disclosure of 2/3/26 is a huge red flag. Share price is down 75% in the month since that move.
These people are sloppy, lazy, and unprofessional. But u know Roxanne, she don't care if it's wrong or if it's right…🫠
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
