You asked for proof, not imagination.
Your own email demanded hard evidence: proof of the metals, proof of labor, proof of actual processing, proof the tokens can function, proof the company is not simply selling narrative.
Then a delayed livestream appears, and suddenly you are writing the operating explanation for them:
"This was a response to my email."
"I guess the process is merely a monitoring scenario."
"I figured out a way to achieve year round processing."
That is the problem.
Nothing in that livestream proves throughput. Nothing proves tonnage. Nothing proves recovery. Nothing proves continuous feed. Nothing proves the metals on the books match reality. Nothing proves token holders can redeem anything.
A camera pointed at equipment does not answer the same questions you raised yourself 24 hours earlier.
And claiming the company responded to your email personally is a leap with zero proof. If anything, the livestream was already overdue by about a year.
You started in the right place: demand evidence.
But now you are filling in operational blanks for management that management still has not documented.
That is not proof. That is narrative support dressed up as analysis.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
