News Focus
News Focus
icon url

chereb19

02/17/26 10:47 AM

#197137 RE: 1hunglo #197136


Planning manufacturing capability ahead of clinical trials is normal regulatory practice. Applications require documented production methods, quality controls, and validation steps so the agency knows the material can be produced consistently and safely before any dosing occurs. Mentioning facilities or licensing in that context is part of preparation, not commercialization.
icon url

Truthsocial

02/17/26 10:49 AM

#197138 RE: 1hunglo #197136

Sounding like scat again. . you have no inside information...
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

CatfishHunter

02/17/26 10:51 AM

#197139 RE: 1hunglo #197136

Let’s separate your deranged emotion from reality for a second.

Preparing manufacturing capability before IDE approval is not “criminal.” It’s standard biotech protocol.

If you wait until after IDE clearance to:

• secure a production site
• validate equipment
• submit radiation handling licenses
• establish GMP protocols

—you delay first patient dosing by 6–12 months minimum.

Regulators expect readiness.

Manufacturing planning doesn’t = commercial production. It means being prepared if authorization is granted.

That’s called operational sequencing — not “cart before the horse.”
__________

Second:

No one is “putting Radiogel into human bodies without FDA approval.” IDE approval is required before U.S. trials begin. That is publicly acknowledged.

Preparing infrastructure while regulatory review proceeds is risk management — not fraud.
__________

Third:

Calling something “criminal per SEC standards” doesn’t make it so. If there were securities fraud:

• There would be an SEC investigation
• There would be enforcement action
• There would be trading suspension

None of that exists.

Throwing around legal accusations without evidence is reckless — not insightful.
__________

Finally:

If management truly believed the product had no path forward, they wouldn’t be investing in:

• facility readiness
• process scaling
• regulatory compliance buildout

Scams avoid capital expenditure.
They don’t prepare manufacturing pipelines.

You can disagree with timing.
You can dislike dilution history.
You can question strategy.

But calling standard biotech preparation “criminal” just exposes how little you understand how regulated medical manufacturing actually works.

When outrage replaces analysis, the argument’s already lost. And you’ve lost. Another swing and a miss!
icon url

SC8

02/17/26 11:30 PM

#197146 RE: 1hunglo #197136

Amen. And notice one of the bigger lies near end: "Vivos Inc. is a clinical-stage medical device company developing RadioGel". No Radiogel clinical trials authorized anywhere, none, yet serial liar MK claims RDGL is a "clinical-stage medical device company developing Radiogel"

What a lying scammer. Pity the fool who buys RDGL offerings