And I saw several hours of the Pam Bondi hearing. That was just disgraceful.
Someone should have accused her of being a very angry and unhinged woman and asked if she really had the right temperament to lead the DOJ? That would have been a show stopper!!! 😂😂
And then questioned her why there have been over 100 resignations in the DOJ since she became AG? And then asked her again if she knew which one of Nixon's cabinet officials went to jail for him? hehehe 🤣🤣
Yes, on any issue, ranging from whether Bondi is an abject Trump toady to which finger do most people pick their noses with there will always be morons who get it wrong, and these days you could bet the one who doesn't click that people only have one nose would be a Trump supporter.
ABSOLUTE PANDEMONIUM: Pam Bondi Explodes On Jerry Nadler, Jamie Raskin In Shocking Hearing Clash
I only saw select minutes of Bondi bullshit before out weeding four hours ago. I'd bet i made more progress in cleaning the patch then any managed with Bondi,
One stunningly blatant lie by Bondi there 'Mueller found no interference by Russia in 2016.' We know Mueller found a mountain of evidence of Russian conspiracy, but didn't conclude there had been a conspiracy. And tthe bs Biden did nothing:
The FBI Botched the Russia Investigation in 2016 [...] The Horowitz report
The Horowitz report is a confounding document. It does not assess the Russia investigation, the results of which speak for themselves: 37 indictments, including convictions of Trump’s national security adviser, campaign chairman, deputy campaign chairman, personal lawyer, and close political adviser.9 Instead, Horowitz primarily assesses Trump’s outlandish conspiracy theories, relitigating long-answered questions of how and why the Russia investigation began. [...] While the FBI’s caution in investigating a presidential candidate is understandable, they ignored the elephant in the room: Donald Trump himself. Despite evidence that members of Trump’s campaign were aiding and abetting Russia’s attack on the United States, the FBI treated them as victims of infiltration by Russian-aligned actors.13 It was only months after the election—following Trump’s dismissal of then-FBI Director James Comey,14 that the agency opened up a counterintelligence investigation15 into the president, the results of which remain unknown
Crossfire Hurricane’s ‘light footprint’
The Horowitz report documents how the FBI intentionally kept an extremely close hold on the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, employing a slow, timid, and ultimately limited counterintelligence approach.16 Such caution and sensitivity is standard practice, especially given that the investigation involved a presidential candidate’s campaign during an election season.
FBI officials Page and Strzok discussed this concern over text message in August 2016. When they cited an “insurance policy,”17 they were discussing whether the agency should act with greater urgency to lay the groundwork for continued investigation in the event that Trump won and was, in fact, beholden to Russia. In her first public television interview, Page explained, “The ‘insurance policy’ was an analogy. It’s like an insurance policy when you are 40. You don’t expect to die when you are 40. But you still have an insurance policy.”18 In other words, the point of ramping up the investigation was not to weaponize it against Trump but to lay a foundation for mitigating the threat to national security if he won the presidency.
However, the FBI ultimately chose not to intensify the investigation. Then-Deputy Director of the FBI Andrew McCabe told the DOJ’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) that the FBI wanted “to keep our inquiry as quiet as we could.”19 McCabe gave the team contradictory instructions: “Get to the bottom of this as quickly as possible, but with a light footprint.” The FBI ended up erring strongly on the side of caution.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
