If you actually read the entire complaint, which I seriously doubt, then you would realize that the complaint was competently drafted. Instead you insist that he has no expeience, as if that is the all important basis for your conclusion, and be damned the level of competence in the document.
Any lawyer, can grasp any other specialty of law in the practice of law. Just because a lawyer specilizes in constitutional law , or personal injury, or administrative law, or governmental law,or criminal law. he can adequately extend his reach in any other branch of law. It's called Law and Motion , and discovery, and Pre Trial, and etc.
The only disadvantage he would have is that he must engage in far more legal research and case precedents to be reasonably competent in a different area of law.
In fact, I'm not a licensed attorney, but I am a pretty good unlicensed attorney like individual. And I can readily navigate a decent case. I make a few more mistakes, but I also learn from my mistakes, which can , sometimes be costly, in terms of results.
That said, the complaint and the organization of the complaint is competent, and either you know it, or you don't. I give you the benefit of doubt, that you are merely sounding off and bashing, rather than a stupid ignoramous. The fact is that not only will you NOT give a whole analysis on every example, I will bet that you will NOT give analysis on ANY EXAMPLE, and show your true ignorance = WEAK !!!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
