News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Guido2

12/21/25 10:47 AM

#856611 RE: jeddiemack #856610

💯 Thanks jeddiemack for the excellent post. Can't understand why other "shareholders" don't get it.
icon url

NeoSunTzu

12/21/25 11:56 AM

#856615 RE: jeddiemack #856610

Piggybacking on Jeddiemack and Guido's posts ... I'll find my post from long ago which garnered one of the largest responeses I've seen on this board MAINLY because it just reiterated the sentinments of posts like jeddie's and guido's ... additionally, as far as this X post from Kevin Hassett goes (see the X post below) ... this largest tax refund and housing plan BEST NOT come from what rightfully belongs to shareholders (from the FnF pot of funds they've repaid and earned on THEIR OWN)!

Because of the corruption, theft, and diverted funds, shareholders, in addition to full resotration of shareholder rights without dilution (or relatively minimal dilution), there should be a rather large one-time dividend payout DIRECTLY TO SHAREHOLDERS based on the hundreds of billions paid back over and above the original commitment, the monetization of the common security platform (now known as U.S. Fintech), the hundreds of billions owed to FnF by the big bank fraud (their bad mortgages dumped on FnF) that was paid to the Treasury instead of FnF, and finally the over $100B the companies currently hold - oh and let's not forget the egregiously high regulatory capital bar that must be lowered. Shareholders should rightfully be owed a large dividend in restitution - especially given the lamberth jury verdict - that payout amount is a joke and should come from the Treasury, NOT FnF.

icon url

BBANBOB

12/21/25 5:57 PM

#856633 RE: jeddiemack #856610

JEDDIE
YOU TOO should send your opinion in the HOT LINE for public comments
icon url

EmpressRealm45

12/24/25 10:13 AM

#856797 RE: jeddiemack #856610

Jeddiemack - your pain is well understood and wish you well. Just like we would like to clawback the old profits, the JPS holders would want the same as well for the unpaid dividends for all the previous years. Atleast for commons, we have some of them retained as reserves and that should have a decent return. As long as we rely on the implicit guarantee, the full autonomy of F2 cannot be in play. Based on the loan tiers F2 could get grants or full loan guarantees to gave a sustainable independence. F2 should be compensated in a business operating model for capping spreads and making mortgages affordable to low-income people as - these cannot be the objectives of a publicly traded company. There should be specific grants and guarantees to address adverse market conditions to safeguard the shareholders in that event. 
Bullish
Bullish