Replies to post #554726 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

Don't see how this answers our contradiction in context, yet it does go somewhat to the answer we were thinking it must be. And Zorax said it here:

What I think you have is you're in Australia and Janice is in America and the search data can not be possibly the same given totally different IP's and geological points. I don't think there is any way that each of you is going to the exact same server pulling the data for the request.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=177012262

My search: "how could a google search link from australia give a contradictory overview when clicked in america"

AI Overview

A Google search link from Australia could potentially provide a contradictory overview when clicked in America
due to several technical and algorithmic reasons, primarily stemming from the practice of content personalization and geotargeting.

Here are the primary ways this could occur:

1. Geotargeting and IP Address Detection

The most common reason for this discrepancy is that websites and search engines dynamically adjust the content displayed based on the user's apparent geographic location, as determined by their IP address [1, 2].

* When the link is generated (Australia): The link in the Australian search results might point to a general URL (e.g., www.example.com/product). Google's search result snippet (the "overview") would be generated based on the content a user in Australia would likely see.

* When the link is clicked (America): The website's server detects the American IP address and automatically redirects or serves up the U.S. version of the page (e.g., pricing in USD, different product availability, local news, or regulatory information), which may have different content or an altered overview compared to the Australian version [1, 2].

2. Algorithmic Personalization and Cookies

Google and other search engines personalize search results based on your browsing history, cookies, and user profile [2].

* Australian context: The original overview might have been tailored based on the Australian user's previous searches or preferences.

* American context: The person clicking the link in America will have their own distinct browsing history and cookies. While the URL itself might be the same, the target page might load content differently for the new user, especially if the site relies heavily on A/B testing or user segmentation.

3. Time-Sensitive or Dynamic Content Changes

Websites constantly update their information. If enough time passes between the Australian user generating the search result (which Google caches) and the American user clicking it, the source page's content may have changed.

Google's cached overview might become outdated if the website owner updated the page to reflect new information relevant to a U.S. audience (e.g., a news story evolving, stock prices changing, or a product being discontinued in one market but not another).

4. Intent Misinterpretation Across Regions

Search algorithms are sophisticated in interpreting user intent [2]. A single phrase might have different primary meanings in Australian English versus American English.

* The overview shown in Australia might relate to the dominant local interpretation of a search term.
* The American user might have a different default interpretation, and the landing page, once loaded in the U.S. context, might present information that seems contradictory to the intended Australian search context.

In essence, the link itself acts as a general address, but the content delivered to that address is a dynamic payload determined by where in the world the request originates and who is asking for it [1, 2].

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=how+could+a+google+search+link+from+australia+give+a+contradictory+overview+when+clicked+in+america+

Then there is the question around blackhawks ..
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=177011051 .. where at first i assumed he had used my link too, but now am guessing he asked his own question.

I'm still thinking it could have something to do with your and i different computers.

Maybe it's possible your computer AI got it wrong. Maybe it's that simple. You might be using a Macbook? So Apple AI.

Aside: Wouldn't suit me i can't bite an apple. LOL

[blackhawks]

There's no issue with Google AI on this. They accurately responded to my query, no further searches necessary. The query is everything, specificity is everything.

Was Kirk Douglas in a chariot race in Spartacus?

Google AI

No, Kirk Douglas was not in a chariot race in Spartacus. The film notably avoided genre clichés like chariot races, which were a staple of other Roman epics of the time.

The famous, large-scale chariot race scene is from the film Ben-Hur (1959), released the year prior to Spartacus. That iconic scene featured Charlton Heston (as Judah Ben-Hur) and Stephen Boyd (as Messala) as the rival charioteers.

Kirk Douglas did want to play the lead role of Judah Ben-Hur in that film but was passed over, which then spurred him to develop and produce his own Roman epic, Spartacus.