ummmm...Vicente Fox was the first President in Mexico that wasn't part of the Morena party. That party was in power for 71 years. The current president is part of the Morena party. I have no idea why you would read and believe what someone on twitter or whatever it is...especially an anonymous source The other crap you are sourcing from is this:
The Morena Party has been corrupt for almost a Century. The other problem...Mexico is littered with corruption...so nothing quite new. You would have to live in a cave to not understand such. What is odd is going after Fox...given that of course he would support the protests. He is a stauch advocate against the cartels
I have no idea why anyone would be upset at young people organizing against a GOV that has been and apparently always will be in cahoots with the cartels at some level(plural). You should read up on all of the recent political assinations before you go any further.
LOL Two days to get through it and still skimmed too much. Lot of truth in it we don't see in more main-stream media, i'd say. Excerpt:
Hybrid war in Mexico: how an anti-impunity protest was hijacked
[...]
External clues confirmed the presence of inauthentic coordination. Large numbers of accounts amplifying protest content were created in tight chronological windows, displayed repetitive phrasing, or posted identical videos within minutes of each other. Many used foreign IP proxies or recycled footage from unrelated protests in Latin America and Asia. These patterns matched established signatures of outsourced influence farms operating from abroad. Their purpose was not persuasion but simulation, creating the illusion of broad domestic momentum where little existed organically.
U.S. Digital Influence Networks
The operational fingerprints of the November 15 protests closely match those of documented U.S.-aligned digital influence campaigns deployed across Latin America over the last decade. The tactic relies on constructing the impression of domestic revolt through foreign botnets, AI-generated content, automated engagement, and coordinated diaspora influencers. The pattern echoes Cuba’s July 2021 #SOS surge, Ecuador’s anti-Correa destabilization operations, the Venezuelan agitation cycles, and the online media offensive surrounding Bolivia’s 2019 crisis. In each case, digital simulations of mass unrest preceded or accompanied political pressure campaigns.
Sheinbaum’s disclosure that approximately eight million foreign-linked bots boosted protest messaging fits squarely within this established model. The objective is not to convey truth but to generate a manufactured sense of urgency and inevitability.
Miami-Based Anti–Latin American Left Operations
For decades, Miami has operated as the strategic hub for U.S.-backed anti-left media, political operatives, and diaspora influence operations targeting Latin America. The ecosystem includes exiled officials with historic ties to U.S. security agencies, corporate-funded media personalities, professional agitators, and digital marketing firms contracted for political warfare. These networks have shaped major destabilization campaigns from Cuba to Bolivia, supplying narrative framing, platform coordination, and English-language amplification for international audiences. Their expansion into Mexico is not anomalous. It is the logical extension of a regional influence model designed to counter governments perceived as deviating from U.S. policy preferences.
The United States does not rely on military intervention when information warfare and economic pressure can achieve the same strategic outcomes. Several corporate sectors have significant material interests in reshaping Mexico’s political direction. Major technology firms planning to build AI data centers rely heavily on permissive water and energy regimes. U.S.-based energy corporations view Morena’s nationalistic policies as a direct threat to profit margins. Water-intensive multinationals fear regulatory reforms that would limit extraction or impose higher compliance costs. The U.S. defense industry, tied to border militarization contracts, depends on Mexico remaining inside a cooperative security architecture that prioritizes U.S. technologies and American contractor dominance. These interests converge around the goal of a more pliable Mexican government aligned with U.S. market priorities.
Mexico’s digitally engineered uprising bears hallmarks of transnational influence operations by firms specializing in political data and astroturf mobilization. These firms operate by shaping sentiment through automated amplification, influencer-driven persuasion, and AI-generated propaganda assets. Their objective is to create public pressure environments that appear organic but are in fact manufactured. The November 15 digital surge, with its scripted influencer content, synchronized posting waves, and artificially inflated trends, reflects these techniques.
Foreign bot farms and AI content networks
Analysts tracking the protest noted substantial activity from bot farms operating outside Mexico. These networks replicated known behavioral patterns from regions with a history of outsourcing political influence, including sudden spikes in account creation, uniform slogan repetition, and mass reuse of AI-generated protest visuals. Their purpose was to saturate Mexico’s information space, overwhelm authentic discourse, and manufacture a sense of consensus. The effect was to distort perception, making a digitally fabricated campaign appear national in scope.
The November 15 mobilization unfolded in a sequence characteristic of hybrid operations that fuse domestic actors with foreign influence infrastructure. The narrative was seeded digitally through outside bot networks that launched a synthetic Gen Z revolt across social platforms. Domestic billionaires, particularly those with major media holdings, amplified this messaging until it penetrated mainstream coverage. Influencers and micro-celebrities acted as the human facade, giving the operation recognizable faces that concealed its artificial origin. PRI and PAN supplied the actual bodies on the ground, mobilizing older loyalists who provided the physical presence needed for cameras and digital manipulation. Finally, U.S.-aligned influence networks framed the unrest for international audiences as democratic and spontaneous, reinforcing the storyline needed to build policy pressure.
The result was a coordinated political simulation. Digital assets produced the illusion, media power normalized it, influencers performed it, partisan structures embodied it, and foreign policy ecosystems legitimized it.
Digital regime change
The purpose of the November 15 campaign was not limited to a day of protest. It was aimed at political destabilization through perception engineering. The actors behind it sought to weaken Morena’s domestic legitimacy, fracture political cohesion, and reposition Mexico within a U.S.-aligned regulatory and security framework. Their broader objective is to reestablish PRI–PAN influence over state institutions, secure corporate access to strategic sectors such as water, energy, and AI infrastructure, and create the political conditions for deeper external involvement.
This is not conventional regime change. It is regime change pursued through a digital proxy, built from simulations of public unrest, algorithmic manipulation, and coordinated geopolitical messaging.
What Mexico Is Doing to Combat the Operation
Mexico has begun to mount a coordinated response to the November 15 destabilization effort, combining digital investigation, institutional containment, and strategic communication to prevent a synthetic narrative from shaping political reality. The government’s first priority has been digital forensics. Teams within Infodemia and associated federal cyber units are analyzing the 8 million bot accounts identified by President Sheinbaum, tracing their activity across IP clusters, examining synchronized posting patterns, and identifying their foreign origin points. This work is intended to expose the artificial nature of the online revolt and to gather evidence for public and diplomatic use. By revealing the presence of external digital interference, Mexico is attempting to discredit the narrative foundation of the mobilization before it can become entrenched.
At the same time, federal authorities have acted to prevent the protest from escalating into a physical confrontation that could be leveraged online for dramatic effect. Security forces secured the National Palace and controlled access points around sensitive government buildings, reducing the likelihood of clashes that could be used as propaganda by the operation’s orchestrators. This approach reflects an understanding that hybrid destabilization campaigns rely heavily on symbolic imagery and televised confrontation, and that denying these visuals can neutralize much of their intended impact.
Mexico’s institutional response has also focused on controlling the spread of disinformation.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
