Replies to post #116821 on Asia Broadband Inc (AABB)

[NotTheRealBeeny]

Penny Pirate, you just wrote an entire paragraph of feelings, predictions, and imaginary future events, and not one sentence addressed the actual problem that was put in front of you.

You didn’t touch the missing disclosures.
You didn’t touch the broken buyback math.
You didn’t touch the nonexistent rGO vendors.
You didn’t touch the missing Bonanza terms.
You didn’t touch the unsupported 23.5M intangible.
You didn’t touch the 7.623M debt cancellation with no creditor.
You didn’t touch why Q3 shows 4.63B shares but the TA shows 4.18B.

Instead, you pivoted to the usual pumper script:

• “audit will eventually happen”
• “catalysts in the pipeline”
• “up-listing someday”
• “silver token”
• “new wallet”
• “naked shorting”
• “manipulation”
• “IMHO”

This isn’t analysis. It’s wishcasting.

You keep talking about what might happen, what could happen, what management says, and what your gut feeling is. None of that overrides the fact that the current filings are missing required disclosures and contradict their own PRs.

Here’s what you’re actually doing:

When the filings fail, you retreat into fantasy land.
When the numbers don’t add up, you shout “audit soon.”
When someone points out contradictions, you say “up-listing.”
When someone asks for evidence, you yell “naked shorts.”

It’s textbook deflection.

The filings are either accurate or they aren’t.
They either contain required disclosures or they don’t.
They either match prior PRs or they don’t.

And right now:

• They don’t match the PRs
• They don’t match the share count at the transfer agent
• They don’t provide required GAAP disclosures
• They don’t support the rGO asset
• They don’t support the Bonanza gain
• They don’t support the debt cancellation
• They don’t support the mineral revenue
• They don’t support the buyback

You can chant about catalysts all you want.
You can sprinkle emojis and optimism all over the page.
You can call facts “negative noise.”

None of that fixes the filings.

If you want to participate in the discussion, address the actual points:

Which ASC disclosures support the rGO intangible?
Where is the buyer and carrying value for the 12.6M gain?
Where is the creditor for the 7.623M settlement?
Why is the TA missing 458M shares if the Q2 issuances were real?
Where is the ore inventory that supports mineral revenue?

Until you can answer even one of those, you’re not debating.
You’re just filling space with inspirational fiction.

[condor1]

Penny Pirate, I have to be honest on this point. I have left a message 3 times to advocate for an audit recently, saying this is the perfect time for an audit, ie price wayyyy down, I would buy more shares if an audit occurred; ie that an audit would smoke out the shorts, etc. No one returned my call. Apparently, Mike Shiekh no longer is investor relations. No return calls, period. Then it is reiterated that an audit will occur when a new stock index is attempted.
Call them up yourself. Same non return call.