Mojo, there most definitely is a case. Defamation doesn’t require someone to profit — it only requires them to publicly publish false statements that damage another’s reputation or business.
Slinger repeatedly calls the CEO a “scumbag,” “liar,” and “fraud,” while pushing narratives of “fake factories” and “nonexistent product.” Those aren’t opinions when presented as fact — they’re statements of fact that are provably false.
When those lies are posted in an investor forum, tied to market sentiment, and repeated daily with intent to influence perception (and thus price), it becomes market manipulation through misinformation.
That’s two layers of potential liability — civil and regulatory.
So yes — there’s very much a case. The only reason it hasn’t been filed yet isn’t because there’s no case — it’s because companies don’t waste legal ammo mid-build.
They document, they archive, and they wait until there’s measurable damage or a clear pattern. Then they act — decisively. If they choose.
Make no mistake, though: when someone crosses from “opinion” into knowingly spreading falsehoods to harm reputation and valuation, that’s not protected speech. That’s actionable.
Bullish
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
