Replies to post #2858 on CBQ, Inc. (China Business Quotient) (fka CBQI)

[Georgia Bard]

Bix you are off topic with this whole nine yards. I have made Bart aware of Kaufman and kaufman aware of Bart for synergy possibilities.

However Ultra is a middle man though the chinese partner has influence I discovered. But again they are not doing what CBQ is doing.

As far as verification on the profit margins that all from the data that is out there and no one knows what it will be. Even if we take what is out in the media you want to lock CBQ to it.

You make no sense at all but CHina is cheaper and Bart states 40% and I only took what some threw out as a comparison. Now it is law. You can continue but you are not living in reality.

Egg is coming Bix .. and OSI has nothing to do with CBQ. SHanghai Computers has nothing to do with CBQ, SOBUS has nothing to do with CBQ, IBM has nothing to do with CBQ.

You love testing the thread disruption and off topic and I guess its time to deal with you again. Find a threrad where all this is relevent would you. Or at least show where it has some merit to some point with CBQ.

You never can link your disruption to CBQ> This stunt today you are trying to imply CBQ has nothing worth anything to anyone for any reason like that whole bunch of nonsense you did with this off topic compnay trying to say CBQ had no first mover advantage.

CIIR cash & restricted stock

:=) Gary Swancey